This page contains the most important details of this project. If you find the information on this project inaccurate or inappropriate, please let us know by contacting us.
Submit Audition/Proposal on this Project
Rate this Project
Invitation Inbox
Project Main Details
Public Lead - 9206275 - Male voice over needed for audiobook
9206275
I have a 2000-page (double-spaced) trial transcript that I would like to have turned into an audiobook. Includes both male and female characters; you would read both.
May 24, 2006 18:01:14 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
May 25, 2006 00:00:00 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
No (click here to learn more about 
)
Closed
5
5
0 direct invitation(s) have been sent by the voice seeker resulting in 0 audition(s) and/or proposal(s) so far.
)
Closed
5
5
0 direct invitation(s) have been sent by the voice seeker resulting in 0 audition(s) and/or proposal(s) so far.
Project Parameters
None
To be defined
Promos
English - British
Not defined
Middle Age Male OR Senior Male
Not defined
There are no special pre-, post-, or production requirements for this project.
Not defined
Not defined
No
Not defined
Script Details
Yes
FULL SCRIPT PROVIDED FOR PRICING REFERENCE ONLY//
959
1 didn't it?
2 MS KEARNS: Yes, but, your Honor, this witness
3 testified he wasn't the one negotiating.
4 MR. PANTONI: She asked him about this, Judge.
5 THE COURT: I think it would all be based on hearsay
6 since he wasn't involved in the negotiations.
7 MR. PANTONI: I'll ask Mr. Flatley.
8 Q Who's working on binary oligo encoding today?
9 A That's being done by scientist named Gali Stromberg.
10 I'm sorry, Dr. Gali -- I can't remember Gali's last name.
11 Q This is an important area to the company?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Critical?
14 A Yes.
15 Q What's her last name?
16 A Again I'm not recalling her last name. Her name is
17 Gali. She's a scientist from Israel. She does great work.
18 Q And who does Gali, last name unknown, report to?
19 A I believe she reports to Dr. Chanfeng Zhao.
20 Q You testified that Illumina conducted a 16 bead
21 experiment, decoding experiment?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And a 128 bead experiment?
24 A Yes.
25 Q You think maybe a 256?
26 A Yes.
27 Q And a 768?
28 A Yes.
---------------------------------------
960
1 Q Did Illumina ever conduct a 4096 bead experiment?
2 A I don't recall. Don't know. I think there might have
3 been feasibility experiments that showed that reaching 4000 was
4 done by Illumina. I don't think we did an experiment to decode
5 4000 beads. So again it's the difference between proof of
6 principle and feasibility versus actually decoding 4000 beads.
7 Q You say the mislabeling the dyes -- strike that. Did
8 the mislabeling of the dyes in your opinion have no effect
9 whatsoever on the results of the 768 decode experiment?
10 A It did not affect the conclusions that one could draw
11 from that experiment.
12 Q Kevin Gunderson is the person who conducted that
13 experiment, isn't he?
14 A He was among a team. This was a team project. It
15 involved the people both from the chemistry department and from
16 the molecular biology department.
17 Q Did you read Kevin Gunderson's report about the 768
18 bead experiment?
19 A I don't think I did.
20 Q You never did? Even up through today's date you have
21 not seen it?
22 A No.
23 Q Would it surprise you if he said the results were
24 somewhat compromised because of the mislabeling issue?
25 A That certainly could be. Kevin is a great scientist.
26 The fact that results are compromised doesn't lead one to reach
27 the conclusion that the conclusion was wrong or the conclusion was
28 incorrect.
-----------------------------------------
960
1 Q Did Illumina ever conduct a 4096 bead experiment?
2 A I don't recall. Don't know. I think there might have
3 been feasibility experiments that showed that reaching 4000 was
4 done by Illumina. I don't think we did an experiment to decode
5 4000 beads. So again it's the difference between proof of
6 principle and feasibility versus actually decoding 4000 beads.
7 Q You say the mislabeling the dyes -- strike that. Did
8 the mislabeling of the dyes in your opinion have no effect
9 whatsoever on the results of the 768 decode experiment?
10 A It did not affect the conclusions that one could draw
11 from that experiment.
12 Q Kevin Gunderson is the person who conducted that
13 experiment, isn't he?
14 A He was among a team. This was a team project. It
15 involved the people both from the chemistry department and from
16 the molecular biology department.
17 Q Did you read Kevin Gunderson's report about the 768
18 bead experiment?
19 A I don't think I did.
20 Q You never did? Even up through today's date you have
21 not seen it?
22 A No.
23 Q Would it surprise you if he said the results were
24 somewhat compromised because of the mislabeling issue?
25 A That certainly could be. Kevin is a great scientist.
26 The fact that results are compromised doesn't lead one to reach
27 the conclusion that the conclusion was wrong or the conclusion was
28 incorrect.
-----------------------------------------
959
1 didn't it?
2 MS KEARNS: Yes, but, your Honor, this witness
3 testified he wasn't the one negotiating.
4 MR. PANTONI: She asked him about this, Judge.
5 THE COURT: I think it would all be based on hearsay
6 since he wasn't involved in the negotiations.
7 MR. PANTONI: I'll ask Mr. Flatley.
8 Q Who's working on binary oligo encoding today?
9 A That's being done by scientist named Gali Stromberg.
10 I'm sorry, Dr. Gali -- I can't remember Gali's last name.
11 Q This is an important area to the company?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Critical?
14 A Yes.
15 Q What's her last name?
16 A Again I'm not recalling her last name. Her name is
17 Gali. She's a scientist from Israel. She does great work.
18 Q And who does Gali, last name unknown, report to?
19 A I believe she reports to Dr. Chanfeng Zhao.
20 Q You testified that Illumina conducted a 16 bead
21 experiment, decoding experiment?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And a 128 bead experiment?
24 A Yes.
25 Q You think maybe a 256?
26 A Yes.
27 Q And a 768?
28 A Yes.
959
1 didn't it?
2 MS KEARNS: Yes, but, your Honor, this witness
3 testified he wasn't the one negotiating.
4 MR. PANTONI: She asked him about this, Judge.
5 THE COURT: I think it would all be based on hearsay
6 since he wasn't involved in the negotiations.
7 MR. PANTONI: I'll ask Mr. Flatley.
8 Q Who's working on binary oligo encoding today?
9 A That's being done by scientist named Gali Stromberg.
10 I'm sorry, Dr. Gali -- I can't remember Gali's last name.
11 Q This is an important area to the company?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Critical?
14 A Yes.
15 Q What's her last name?
16 A Again I'm not recalling her last name. Her name is
17 Gali. She's a scientist from Israel. She does great work.
18 Q And who does Gali, last name unknown, report to?
19 A I believe she reports to Dr. Chanfeng Zhao.
20 Q You testified that Illumina conducted a 16 bead
21 experiment, decoding experiment?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And a 128 bead experiment?
24 A Yes.
25 Q You think maybe a 256?
26 A Yes.
27 Q And a 768?
28 A Yes.
---------------------------------------
960
1 Q Did Illumina ever conduct a 4096 bead experiment?
2 A I don't recall. Don't know. I think there might have
3 been feasibility experiments that showed that reaching 4000 was
4 done by Illumina. I don't think we did an experiment to decode
5 4000 beads. So again it's the difference between proof of
6 principle and feasibility versus actually decoding 4000 beads.
7 Q You say the mislabeling the dyes -- strike that. Did
8 the mislabeling of the dyes in your opinion have no effect
9 whatsoever on the results of the 768 decode experiment?
10 A It did not affect the conclusions that one could draw
11 from that experiment.
12 Q Kevin Gunderson is the person who conducted that
13 experiment, isn't he?
14 A He was among a team. This was a team project. It
15 involved the people both from the chemistry department and from
16 the molecular biology department.
17 Q Did you read Kevin Gunderson's report about the 768
18 bead experiment?
19 A I don't think I did.
20 Q You never did? Even up through today's date you have
21 not seen it?
22 A No.
23 Q Would it surprise you if he said the results were
24 somewhat compromised because of the mislabeling issue?
25 A That certainly could be. Kevin is a great scientist.
26 The fact that results are compromised doesn't lead one to reach
27 the conclusion that the conclusion was wrong or the conclusion was
28 incorrect.
-----------------------------------------
960
1 Q Did Illumina ever conduct a 4096 bead experiment?
2 A I don't recall. Don't know. I think there might have
3 been feasibility experiments that showed that reaching 4000 was
4 done by Illumina. I don't think we did an experiment to decode
5 4000 beads. So again it's the difference between proof of
6 principle and feasibility versus actually decoding 4000 beads.
7 Q You say the mislabeling the dyes -- strike that. Did
8 the mislabeling of the dyes in your opinion have no effect
9 whatsoever on the results of the 768 decode experiment?
10 A It did not affect the conclusions that one could draw
11 from that experiment.
12 Q Kevin Gunderson is the person who conducted that
13 experiment, isn't he?
14 A He was among a team. This was a team project. It
15 involved the people both from the chemistry department and from
16 the molecular biology department.
17 Q Did you read Kevin Gunderson's report about the 768
18 bead experiment?
19 A I don't think I did.
20 Q You never did? Even up through today's date you have
21 not seen it?
22 A No.
23 Q Would it surprise you if he said the results were
24 somewhat compromised because of the mislabeling issue?
25 A That certainly could be. Kevin is a great scientist.
26 The fact that results are compromised doesn't lead one to reach
27 the conclusion that the conclusion was wrong or the conclusion was
28 incorrect.
-----------------------------------------
959
1 didn't it?
2 MS KEARNS: Yes, but, your Honor, this witness
3 testified he wasn't the one negotiating.
4 MR. PANTONI: She asked him about this, Judge.
5 THE COURT: I think it would all be based on hearsay
6 since he wasn't involved in the negotiations.
7 MR. PANTONI: I'll ask Mr. Flatley.
8 Q Who's working on binary oligo encoding today?
9 A That's being done by scientist named Gali Stromberg.
10 I'm sorry, Dr. Gali -- I can't remember Gali's last name.
11 Q This is an important area to the company?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Critical?
14 A Yes.
15 Q What's her last name?
16 A Again I'm not recalling her last name. Her name is
17 Gali. She's a scientist from Israel. She does great work.
18 Q And who does Gali, last name unknown, report to?
19 A I believe she reports to Dr. Chanfeng Zhao.
20 Q You testified that Illumina conducted a 16 bead
21 experiment, decoding experiment?
22 A Yes.
23 Q And a 128 bead experiment?
24 A Yes.
25 Q You think maybe a 256?
26 A Yes.
27 Q And a 768?
28 A Yes.
Please note that you should only use the script or your recording of it for auditioning purposes. The script is property, unless otherwise specified, of the voice seeker and it is protected by international copyright laws.
Voice-Seeker Details
Voice123 Team Comments
Voice123 consultations with this voice seeker regarding this project and/or other projects by this voice seeker, via phone, chat, and/or email.
This project - phone.
Previous projects - phone.
This project - email or chat.
Previous projects - email or chat.
Corporate web site for this voice-seeker confirmed by Voice123
Note: Voice123 strives to establish the legitimacy of all projects posted. However, Voice123 subscribers and users are responsible for confirming information stated by prospective voice seekers, agents and/or clients. Voice123 subscribers and users assume all liability for use of any information found through Voice123, LLC, or any of its publications.
