This page contains the most important details of this project. If you find the information on this project inaccurate or inappropriate, please let us know by contacting us.
Submit Audition/Proposal on this Project
Rate this Project
Invitation Inbox
Project Main Details
2283613
2283613
I am interested receiving a few quotes for a potential voice over marketing presentation. I have two scripts in need of voice overs. I expect each script to be just under eight minutes each. The voice overs will be used on my website for marketing my engineering software product and consulting services. The first script will compliment our software demo, and the second compliments a PowerPoint slide show that demonstrates a few of my past consulting projects.
I would like the recording to be in an MP3 format.
I am an independent engineering consultant with a somewhat challenging budget. This is the first voice over project that I have ever requested, and I am in great hopes that the pricing will be something that will fit in my budget.
I have attached the two scripts in PDF format to this e-mail. Please have the quotes sent to me at the above e-mail address.
Thanks,
Dec 31, 2004 14:40:18 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) Jan 01, 2005 00:00:00 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) No (click here to learn more about
)
Closed
4
0
0 direct invitation(s) have been sent by the voice seeker resulting in 0 audition(s) and/or proposal(s) so far.
I would like the recording to be in an MP3 format.
I am an independent engineering consultant with a somewhat challenging budget. This is the first voice over project that I have ever requested, and I am in great hopes that the pricing will be something that will fit in my budget.
I have attached the two scripts in PDF format to this e-mail. Please have the quotes sent to me at the above e-mail address.
Thanks,
Dec 31, 2004 14:40:18 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) Jan 01, 2005 00:00:00 (GMT -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) No (click here to learn more about
)
Closed
4
0
0 direct invitation(s) have been sent by the voice seeker resulting in 0 audition(s) and/or proposal(s) so far.
Project Parameters
None
To be defined
Promos
English - North American
Not defined
Young Adult Female OR Middle Age Female
Not defined
There are no special pre-, post-, or production requirements for this project.
Not defined
Not defined
No
Not defined
Script Details
No
Script 1
DFSS II™ Case Study Presentation
[Introduction Slide]
International and industrial competitors motivate us to stay on the cutting edge of technology with our
designs and manufacturing processes. Innovative technologies like those included in our DFSS II™
product give engineers the powerful ability to include analytical considerations for manufacturing cost
and quality into new designs before they are completed and sent to the factory floor. This concept is at
the very heart of Design for Six Sigma!
In the following case studies, we will demonstrate how our technology has provided design solutions
resulting in well over $40 million dollars of cost savings.
[Case Study Slide #1]
On this project, we were working with a major aerospace contractor in North America. They were
producing jet engines for the commercial aerospace market. During production, they were experiencing
difficult rework challenges as a result of the engine and fan cowl inappropriately matching up during
assembly.
We completed the design analysis using DFSS II™ and determined that the current design allowed a
very large gap of sixty-eight thousands of an inch. This was the source of the assembly problem. We
used our tool to improve the assembly design in just a few critical-to- quality areas. Using process
capability data and minor design changes, we were able to minimize the gap to less than seventeen
thousands of an inch and achieve a 100% manufacturing quality level.
As a result, the expensive rework was completely eliminated, and the assembly variation was
dramatically improved by 75%!
[Case Study Slide #2]
This next project is one where we modified the design using process capability data to introduce a much
less expensive process. The optics gimbal assembly was initially designed using a standard engineering
design process. Many of the critical-to-quality features required an expensive jig bore process to meet
the requirements. By mathematically understanding the process capabilities of other processes and their
relationship in the assembly, we were able to reallocate the tolerances until a standard N/C machining
center could be used completely to replace the N/C Jig bore machining process.
This technique eliminated the need to purchase additional capital equipment and significantly reduced
the manufacturing time and cost required to produce the products. Over $4.1 million dollars of cost
saving were realized over the product life cycle of this project!
[Case Study Slide #3]
This project was very complex, and crossed several technology areas. The product quantities were
considered very high over the life cycle of this product. Design for Six Sigma tools and techniques were
used to improve quality and reduce costs before the design was released for production. Designs
improvements were documented to determine the impact of design for six sigma tools and techniques.
2
Using Design for Six Sigma tools and process capability models, design improvements were introduced
that eliminated future scrap and rework problems. Individual machined parts were redesigned to
accommodate standard N/C machining centers vs. expensive N/C jig bore machines, interconnect wire
types were substituted to improve quality, mirrors and lenses were reoriented to optimize assembly
quality. Numerous other quality improvements were introduced to enhance the product’s performance
based on a rich understanding of process capability data.
The results were staggering at $42.5 Million dollars of cost improvements over the life cycle of this
product!
[Case Study Slide #4]
On this project, we were working with a major commercial lighting fixture company in North America.
They were initiating the design of a new lighting fixture for office buildings. It would require very high
production rates in a very competitive market. Data was collected from historical designs as a baseline
for later comparison to the DFSS II™ design so that we could better understand the impact of Design for
Six Sigma on this project.
Quality data was collected over nine months of high volume production in Mexico and the United States
to determine the results. DFSS II™ quality predictions were then validated against actual production
results with precise accuracy!
The DFSS II™ design significantly improved the baseline design from a 2.5 Sigma quality level to a 5.6
Sigma quality level! The baseline lighting fixture averaged 117 design changes after it was released to
production. The DFSS II™ design had ZERO design changes after nine months of high volume
production! In this highly competitive field, time-to-market is tied directly to profitability. The DFSS
II™ design reduced the average time-to-market by a full four months!
By eliminating defects early during the early design phase, we dramatically improved product quality,
eliminated expensive design changes during production, and provided a distinctive competitive
advantage for our client in product time-to-market!
The saving on this single project exceeded $800,000!
[Case Study Slide Summary]
By considering quality and cost of manufacturing processes during the initial design stage, engineers
and quality professionals can effectively produce world-class designs at the most competitive prices!
With only a few examples of Design for Six Sigma we have demonstrated well over $40 million dollars
of cost savings with dramatically improved quality levels.
Your company has the opportunity to take advantage of the competitive spirit of this technology and
achieve similar results today!
Script 2
DFSS II™ Software Demo
[Primary DFSS II Screen]
Engineering professionals typically focus on the fit, form and function for new designs as the criteria for
success. Design changes and process improvements are then made during production to meet quality
and cost requirements.
Imagine a technology that gives engineering professionals the tools and information needed to design
products with zero defects before a single product is ever produced! Imagine world-class designs in a
competitive market with superior time-to-market!
Sterling Technologies offers that technology today! It is included in our DFSS II™ software product
and extensive set of process capability prediction models.
DFSS II™ is ingeniously designed to anticipate and accurately predict manufacturing defects in product
piece-part and assembly designs using advanced design techniques and process capability models.
[Variables Analysis Screen]
During the early design stage of new products, designs are very flexible and adaptable to change at the
lowest cost. By understanding where future defects will occur, designs can easily be improved and the
highest quality standards achieved.
From the variables design analysis screen, we can select the manufacturing process and associated
tolerance to accurately predict where potential defects will occur. When calculated quality results are
unacceptable, the tolerances or processes can be altered and the appropriate quality level achieved.
Once this technique is mastered, alternate processes can be considered to achieve optimum results in
quality and cost.
From the design roll-up, engineers can consider the overall quality of a single piece-part design.
Analyses can then be saved, retrieved, exported or shared with other engineers or quality professionals.
[Attribute Analysis Screen]
Some features are most accurately expressed with attribute models. For attribute analyses, processes
and subcategories are selected showing where problem areas may occur. Defect rates for each feature
will be displayed as each selection is made. This enables engineers to modify the design and eliminate
defects during the early design stage long before defects ever reach the factory floor.
[Assembly Type Selection Screen]
From the Assembly Design Analysis screen, we can consider two different assembly analysis options.
One option includes a standard assembly stack-up analysis. The other option includes the assembly of
parts with floating or fixed fastener patterns.
2
[Assembly Stack-up Screen]
Our assembly stack-up analysis will enable engineers to design complex products that always fit to
perfection! We achieve this by calculating dimensional worst case, root-sum-squares, and the
probability of assembly using our process capability models.
Simply enter the critical-to-quality dimensions for the assembly stackup and select the appropriate
process. The information needed for design decisions will be appropriately displayed on-screen. This
provides the engineer with critical process information for achieving superior designs.
Analyses can then be saved, retrieved, exported or shared with other engineers and quality professionals.
[Assembly Bolt Hole Screen]
Our assembly analysis for floating and fixed fastener patterns enhance the engineer’s ability to design
perfect assemblies. We use the standard virtual condition formulas for calculating potential assembly
interferences. We have also included an innovative technique using process capability models to ensure
that the processes selected will produce 100% defect free assemblies with maximum assembly precision.
[Model Builder Screen]
DFSS II™ includes a comprehensive set of well over 600 manufacturing process capability models.
Most companies do not collect process capability data consistently, or collect the right kind of process
capability data to support Design for Six Sigma analyses. Our product includes the first commercially
available process capability database of its kind. It was developed using best practices across multiple
manufacturing operations, and is essential for anyone designing for Six Sigma at the detail level.
Our process capability models are the result of over nine years of experience in developing, validating,
and successfully using process capability models in DFSS applications.
Our standard manufacturing process capability database includes models in the following technology
areas: Mechanical design and fabrication, casting designs, and nonmetallic designs. The model builder
section of DFSS II™ gives your team the option to add new technology areas, new processes, or modify
existing ones.
[Overall Summary]
In summary, DFSS II™ is a powerful Six Sigma design tool with an invaluable process capability
knowledge base. It is essential for all quality professionals who passionately pursue the design of Six
Sigma products and high profits! N/A
DFSS II™ Case Study Presentation
[Introduction Slide]
International and industrial competitors motivate us to stay on the cutting edge of technology with our
designs and manufacturing processes. Innovative technologies like those included in our DFSS II™
product give engineers the powerful ability to include analytical considerations for manufacturing cost
and quality into new designs before they are completed and sent to the factory floor. This concept is at
the very heart of Design for Six Sigma!
In the following case studies, we will demonstrate how our technology has provided design solutions
resulting in well over $40 million dollars of cost savings.
[Case Study Slide #1]
On this project, we were working with a major aerospace contractor in North America. They were
producing jet engines for the commercial aerospace market. During production, they were experiencing
difficult rework challenges as a result of the engine and fan cowl inappropriately matching up during
assembly.
We completed the design analysis using DFSS II™ and determined that the current design allowed a
very large gap of sixty-eight thousands of an inch. This was the source of the assembly problem. We
used our tool to improve the assembly design in just a few critical-to- quality areas. Using process
capability data and minor design changes, we were able to minimize the gap to less than seventeen
thousands of an inch and achieve a 100% manufacturing quality level.
As a result, the expensive rework was completely eliminated, and the assembly variation was
dramatically improved by 75%!
[Case Study Slide #2]
This next project is one where we modified the design using process capability data to introduce a much
less expensive process. The optics gimbal assembly was initially designed using a standard engineering
design process. Many of the critical-to-quality features required an expensive jig bore process to meet
the requirements. By mathematically understanding the process capabilities of other processes and their
relationship in the assembly, we were able to reallocate the tolerances until a standard N/C machining
center could be used completely to replace the N/C Jig bore machining process.
This technique eliminated the need to purchase additional capital equipment and significantly reduced
the manufacturing time and cost required to produce the products. Over $4.1 million dollars of cost
saving were realized over the product life cycle of this project!
[Case Study Slide #3]
This project was very complex, and crossed several technology areas. The product quantities were
considered very high over the life cycle of this product. Design for Six Sigma tools and techniques were
used to improve quality and reduce costs before the design was released for production. Designs
improvements were documented to determine the impact of design for six sigma tools and techniques.
2
Using Design for Six Sigma tools and process capability models, design improvements were introduced
that eliminated future scrap and rework problems. Individual machined parts were redesigned to
accommodate standard N/C machining centers vs. expensive N/C jig bore machines, interconnect wire
types were substituted to improve quality, mirrors and lenses were reoriented to optimize assembly
quality. Numerous other quality improvements were introduced to enhance the product’s performance
based on a rich understanding of process capability data.
The results were staggering at $42.5 Million dollars of cost improvements over the life cycle of this
product!
[Case Study Slide #4]
On this project, we were working with a major commercial lighting fixture company in North America.
They were initiating the design of a new lighting fixture for office buildings. It would require very high
production rates in a very competitive market. Data was collected from historical designs as a baseline
for later comparison to the DFSS II™ design so that we could better understand the impact of Design for
Six Sigma on this project.
Quality data was collected over nine months of high volume production in Mexico and the United States
to determine the results. DFSS II™ quality predictions were then validated against actual production
results with precise accuracy!
The DFSS II™ design significantly improved the baseline design from a 2.5 Sigma quality level to a 5.6
Sigma quality level! The baseline lighting fixture averaged 117 design changes after it was released to
production. The DFSS II™ design had ZERO design changes after nine months of high volume
production! In this highly competitive field, time-to-market is tied directly to profitability. The DFSS
II™ design reduced the average time-to-market by a full four months!
By eliminating defects early during the early design phase, we dramatically improved product quality,
eliminated expensive design changes during production, and provided a distinctive competitive
advantage for our client in product time-to-market!
The saving on this single project exceeded $800,000!
[Case Study Slide Summary]
By considering quality and cost of manufacturing processes during the initial design stage, engineers
and quality professionals can effectively produce world-class designs at the most competitive prices!
With only a few examples of Design for Six Sigma we have demonstrated well over $40 million dollars
of cost savings with dramatically improved quality levels.
Your company has the opportunity to take advantage of the competitive spirit of this technology and
achieve similar results today!
Script 2
DFSS II™ Software Demo
[Primary DFSS II Screen]
Engineering professionals typically focus on the fit, form and function for new designs as the criteria for
success. Design changes and process improvements are then made during production to meet quality
and cost requirements.
Imagine a technology that gives engineering professionals the tools and information needed to design
products with zero defects before a single product is ever produced! Imagine world-class designs in a
competitive market with superior time-to-market!
Sterling Technologies offers that technology today! It is included in our DFSS II™ software product
and extensive set of process capability prediction models.
DFSS II™ is ingeniously designed to anticipate and accurately predict manufacturing defects in product
piece-part and assembly designs using advanced design techniques and process capability models.
[Variables Analysis Screen]
During the early design stage of new products, designs are very flexible and adaptable to change at the
lowest cost. By understanding where future defects will occur, designs can easily be improved and the
highest quality standards achieved.
From the variables design analysis screen, we can select the manufacturing process and associated
tolerance to accurately predict where potential defects will occur. When calculated quality results are
unacceptable, the tolerances or processes can be altered and the appropriate quality level achieved.
Once this technique is mastered, alternate processes can be considered to achieve optimum results in
quality and cost.
From the design roll-up, engineers can consider the overall quality of a single piece-part design.
Analyses can then be saved, retrieved, exported or shared with other engineers or quality professionals.
[Attribute Analysis Screen]
Some features are most accurately expressed with attribute models. For attribute analyses, processes
and subcategories are selected showing where problem areas may occur. Defect rates for each feature
will be displayed as each selection is made. This enables engineers to modify the design and eliminate
defects during the early design stage long before defects ever reach the factory floor.
[Assembly Type Selection Screen]
From the Assembly Design Analysis screen, we can consider two different assembly analysis options.
One option includes a standard assembly stack-up analysis. The other option includes the assembly of
parts with floating or fixed fastener patterns.
2
[Assembly Stack-up Screen]
Our assembly stack-up analysis will enable engineers to design complex products that always fit to
perfection! We achieve this by calculating dimensional worst case, root-sum-squares, and the
probability of assembly using our process capability models.
Simply enter the critical-to-quality dimensions for the assembly stackup and select the appropriate
process. The information needed for design decisions will be appropriately displayed on-screen. This
provides the engineer with critical process information for achieving superior designs.
Analyses can then be saved, retrieved, exported or shared with other engineers and quality professionals.
[Assembly Bolt Hole Screen]
Our assembly analysis for floating and fixed fastener patterns enhance the engineer’s ability to design
perfect assemblies. We use the standard virtual condition formulas for calculating potential assembly
interferences. We have also included an innovative technique using process capability models to ensure
that the processes selected will produce 100% defect free assemblies with maximum assembly precision.
[Model Builder Screen]
DFSS II™ includes a comprehensive set of well over 600 manufacturing process capability models.
Most companies do not collect process capability data consistently, or collect the right kind of process
capability data to support Design for Six Sigma analyses. Our product includes the first commercially
available process capability database of its kind. It was developed using best practices across multiple
manufacturing operations, and is essential for anyone designing for Six Sigma at the detail level.
Our process capability models are the result of over nine years of experience in developing, validating,
and successfully using process capability models in DFSS applications.
Our standard manufacturing process capability database includes models in the following technology
areas: Mechanical design and fabrication, casting designs, and nonmetallic designs. The model builder
section of DFSS II™ gives your team the option to add new technology areas, new processes, or modify
existing ones.
[Overall Summary]
In summary, DFSS II™ is a powerful Six Sigma design tool with an invaluable process capability
knowledge base. It is essential for all quality professionals who passionately pursue the design of Six
Sigma products and high profits! N/A
Please note that you should only use the script or your recording of it for auditioning purposes. The script is property, unless otherwise specified, of the voice seeker and it is protected by international copyright laws.
Voice-Seeker Details
Voice123 Team Comments
Voice123 consultations with this voice seeker regarding this project and/or other projects by this voice seeker, via phone, chat, and/or email.
This project - phone.
Previous projects - phone.
This project - email or chat.
Previous projects - email or chat.
Corporate web site for this voice-seeker confirmed by Voice123
Note: Voice123 strives to establish the legitimacy of all projects posted. However, Voice123 subscribers and users are responsible for confirming information stated by prospective voice seekers, agents and/or clients. Voice123 subscribers and users assume all liability for use of any information found through Voice123, LLC, or any of its publications.
